. Nonetheless, by some means, they think that taking absent Section 230 would magically lead to more removals of “poor” information. That’s the opposite of true. Remove 230 and things like removing hateful inf

"Print on demand" technologies, which make it doable to print as several as just one book at a time, have made self-publishing (and vanity publishing) easier and more affordable, and has allowed publishers to

ACM is delighted to announce that its Publications Board has authorized an updated Peer Review Policy. In case you have any questions regarding the update, the associated FAQ addresses subject areas such as co

I’m worried about 230 getting the axe, way too. But as someone with no real sociopolitical power, I couldn’t stop that from occurring even though I tried. Whatever happens, happens; we’ll all have to adapt by

. Still, somehow, they think that taking absent Section 230 would magically lead to more removals of “terrible” content. That’s the opposite of true. Eliminate 230 and things like removing hateful information,